Alright, I can’t stand Ann Coulter any more than the next person, but I’ve had it. People, progressives, there’s plenty of material with which to deride Ann Coulter without references to an "Adam’s apple" or "Ann the Man." Can we please stick to legitimate criticisms without also sliding into transphobia?
RSS feed for comments on this post.
OK. I plead guilty to this When I got my iPhone 4, I gave Parker my old iPhone 3G (with parental controls in place, phone service deactivated, everything restored to factory settings, history wiped clean, and internet access and the App Store on lockdown) to play games on, etc. But does that make me a “Scrooge”? Puh-leeze. An eight-year-old needs the latest iPhone?
It’s happening again. I’m getting that “I’ve got a book in me, if I can make time to write it,” feeling. Of course, that “if” is the big, and the deciding, factor.
I was never one of those who claim “there’s no such thing as bisexuality.” I’ve known too many bisexuals to buy that the “don’t exist.” So, I’m not surprised that a study now indicates there is too such a thing as bisexuality. In men, that is.
Apparently, it’s hard to build a successful television show around someone who’s (a) unlikeable and (b) had no discernible talent beyond reproducing.
It’s not that I don’t trust the guy, and maybe the whole Weinergate thing has me a little gun shy, but am I the only who thinks Obama tweeting for himself may not be the best idea?
Archive for Asides »
del.icio.usPowered by WordPress. Theme: TheBuckmaker. Bank
Posts
Amen. And I would also like to add ‘sexism’ to your plea. Her ideas are ugly enough without resorting to sexist, homophobic remarks.
P.S. Along these same lines, you may get a kick out of this: http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2006/06/14/you-ask-we-provide/
The only people that really seem to care about her is liberals. I don’t know why she always gets a forum.