<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nonfamily Families</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.republicoft.com/2006/10/17/nonfamily-families/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.republicoft.com/2006/10/17/nonfamily-families/</link>
	<description>Black. Gay. Father. Vegetarian. Buddhist. Liberal.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tanna K</title>
		<link>http://www.republicoft.com/2006/10/17/nonfamily-families/#comment-8795</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanna K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/2006/10/17/nonfamily-families/#comment-8795</guid>
		<description>Studds' pension largely comes from the General Fund. 
Studds paid in 1.8 percent, the other 99.2 percent comes from the General Fund.
As a single man, he probably chose an individual plan. 
He could have purchased an insurable interest annuity for a close relative or for a partner, but it's apparent that he didn't do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Studds&#8217; pension largely comes from the General Fund.<br />
Studds paid in 1.8 percent, the other 99.2 percent comes from the General Fund.<br />
As a single man, he probably chose an individual plan.<br />
He could have purchased an insurable interest annuity for a close relative or for a partner, but it&#8217;s apparent that he didn&#8217;t do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meriblog: Meri Williams&#8217; Weblog &#187; links for 2006-10-18</title>
		<link>http://www.republicoft.com/2006/10/17/nonfamily-families/#comment-8765</link>
		<dc:creator>Meriblog: Meri Williams&#8217; Weblog &#187; links for 2006-10-18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/2006/10/17/nonfamily-families/#comment-8765</guid>
		<description>[...] Nonfamily Families at The Republic of T. &#8220;Gerry Studds, the nation’s first openly gay congressman, pushed the country to another landmark development when he died Saturday: the federal government for the first time will deny death benefits to a congressman’s gay spouse.&#8221; (tags: republicoft gaypolitics gaymarriage gayrights usa discrimination diversity pensions) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nonfamily Families at The Republic of T. &#8220;Gerry Studds, the nation’s first openly gay congressman, pushed the country to another landmark development when he died Saturday: the federal government for the first time will deny death benefits to a congressman’s gay spouse.&#8221; (tags: republicoft gaypolitics gaymarriage gayrights usa discrimination diversity pensions) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Family Research Council Takes Hate to a Whole New Level - from The Zero Boss by Jay Andrew Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.republicoft.com/2006/10/17/nonfamily-families/#comment-8633</link>
		<dc:creator>Family Research Council Takes Hate to a Whole New Level - from The Zero Boss by Jay Andrew Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/2006/10/17/nonfamily-families/#comment-8633</guid>
		<description>[...] That these scum-suckers at the FRC would disrespect this couple - and insult Condi for one of the few things she&#8217;s done RIGHT in the past year - makes me want to vomit. Comparing two consenting adults to a pedophiliac closet-case? That&#8217;s disgusting. No - in this day and age, it&#8217;s way beyond disgusting. It&#8217;s hateful. It&#8217;s every bit as dark and spiteful as denying federal death benefits to Gerry Studds&#8217; husband. The only good thing about these words and actions is that they make the goals of the anti-marriage equality forces starkly apparent: the motive in both cases is not to protect, but to destroy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That these scum-suckers at the FRC would disrespect this couple - and insult Condi for one of the few things she&#8217;s done RIGHT in the past year - makes me want to vomit. Comparing two consenting adults to a pedophiliac closet-case? That&#8217;s disgusting. No - in this day and age, it&#8217;s way beyond disgusting. It&#8217;s hateful. It&#8217;s every bit as dark and spiteful as denying federal death benefits to Gerry Studds&#8217; husband. The only good thing about these words and actions is that they make the goals of the anti-marriage equality forces starkly apparent: the motive in both cases is not to protect, but to destroy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
