<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where You Link is What You Get</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.republicoft.com/2007/04/04/where-you-link-is-what-you-get/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.republicoft.com/2007/04/04/where-you-link-is-what-you-get/</link>
	<description>Black. Gay. Father. Vegetarian. Buddhist. Liberal.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.republicoft.com/2007/04/04/where-you-link-is-what-you-get/#comment-72498</link>
		<dc:creator>Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/2007/04/04/where-you-link-is-what-you-get/#comment-72498</guid>
		<description>OT

Hope you don't mind an off topic comment, which I normally wouldn't do, but it just seems important;

There is a great post on The Carpetbagger Report from a few days ago about the mainstream media's (specifically Time magazine's) ignoring the prosecutor purge scandal.

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/10367.html


What explains the failure of the mainstream media to cover the purge scandal for so long, and so many other scandals? Do you think somebody just set up newspaper editors to cheat on their wives, and threatened to tell if the editors wouldn’t play ball when they come back some day and ask for something?

It wouldn’t be that hard to do, when you think about it. People wouldn’t talk about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT</p>
<p>Hope you don&#8217;t mind an off topic comment, which I normally wouldn&#8217;t do, but it just seems important;</p>
<p>There is a great post on The Carpetbagger Report from a few days ago about the mainstream media&#8217;s (specifically Time magazine&#8217;s) ignoring the prosecutor purge scandal.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/10367.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thecarpetbaggerrepo.....10367.html</a></p>
<p>What explains the failure of the mainstream media to cover the purge scandal for so long, and so many other scandals? Do you think somebody just set up newspaper editors to cheat on their wives, and threatened to tell if the editors wouldn’t play ball when they come back some day and ask for something?</p>
<p>It wouldn’t be that hard to do, when you think about it. People wouldn’t talk about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: janinsanfran</title>
		<link>http://www.republicoft.com/2007/04/04/where-you-link-is-what-you-get/#comment-72426</link>
		<dc:creator>janinsanfran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/2007/04/04/where-you-link-is-what-you-get/#comment-72426</guid>
		<description>I've long thought that the reason contemporary capitalism allows some of us to be queer is that we make a good market ... and I try to link to other folks who help me think about such matters. What else would I do?

Thanks for the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve long thought that the reason contemporary capitalism allows some of us to be queer is that we make a good market &#8230; and I try to link to other folks who help me think about such matters. What else would I do?</p>
<p>Thanks for the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Burroway</title>
		<link>http://www.republicoft.com/2007/04/04/where-you-link-is-what-you-get/#comment-72418</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Burroway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/2007/04/04/where-you-link-is-what-you-get/#comment-72418</guid>
		<description>I've been following your threads on the whole blogroll controversey. Now I think you've come to a great point of resolution on the whole thing. What great food for thought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been following your threads on the whole blogroll controversey. Now I think you&#8217;ve come to a great point of resolution on the whole thing. What great food for thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
