The Republic of T.

"I will restore honor and integrity to the White House."

George W. Bush

It’s low-hanging fruit, I know, but after reading yesterday’s news, I had to chuckle to myself. Not necessarily at the misfortunes of the people involved, but at the context.

Three scandals in one day is noteworthy even for the Bush administration. And I know that every White House — Republican and Democratic — has its share of scandals. The mix of money, power, and intrigue in Washington makes it inevitable, especially when you throw in a dash or two of temptation and human fallibility.

But three scandals breaking in one day is big news, or it ought to be, for a president and an administration (and a party, for that matter) pledging to "restore honor and integrity" to the White House, Washington, and government self. And, yes, when you recall that these people were self-appointed exemplars of morality who were going to "show us how it’s done" and set an example for the rest of us, it’s kind of funny.

Read the rest of this entry »

Bear Stearns has been rescued, and its shareholders have been placated. Wall Street has several invigorating injections of billions of tax-payer dollars. Now that a great deal of public wealth has gone to prop up private wealth, maybe some of that public wealth can be used to help, well, the public. But only if the free market fundamentalists in the Bush administration stay out of the way, or trip over themselves while hurrying to offer their idea of a remedy.

Clearly something’s up, because both the White House and Congress are racing to present plans to (finally) bail out homeowners stuck between impending forclosure. Congress is considering proposals. The Bush administration has ideas of its own. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s plan to overhaul regulation of Wall Street is coming under particular scrutiny, because of how much it probably won’t accomplish.

Read the rest of this entry »

It’s interesting how a story takes on a life of it’s own. It’s been a couple of years since I started blogging about Zach, the kid in Tennessee who came out to his parents only to get sent to a “reparative therapy camp.” The story went from a handful of bloggers covering it to The New York Times covering it.

Investigations were launched. The camp was shut down for a while. Then there was as lawwsuit. Then a settlement. Then the camp closed. Sort of. I stopped following the story closely once Zach left the camp and returned home. But now and again I read about developments like the lates one, which I learned of via Box Turtle Bulletin.

John Smid, the guy who was running the place when Zach was there, has resigned.

Read the rest of this entry »

When it comes to blogging these days, when I come across something I want blog about days — even weeks or months — go by before I get around to actually blogging about it. Half the time, I let it go because it’s not news anymore, and I can just imagine people asking, “Why’s he blogging about that? It’s so, like, last week.” (As a result, I have tons of half-written draft posts sitting in queue, most of which will never see the light of day.)

The up side is that almost everything comes around again, and when it does I’ve got something partially written, and maybe even a few links already in hand. So, when I read Billy Wolfe’s story in The New York Times, and how he and his parents finally dealt with bullying, I knew exactly what wanted to say; even though I’m still a couple of days late in saying it.

Read the rest of this entry »

I tend to agree with Oliver. To the rich Clinton donors who told Nancy Pelosi to shut up about superdelegates: No, you shut up. Heaven help me, but I even agree with the Great Orange One. If your candidate can’t win by the rules, then she can’t win. Tough nookie. (Now, maybe you can get her to stop giving the Republicans their rhetoric for the general.)

Sometimes it seems like being gay and having a husband means having to talk abou the kind of things that other people take for granted, even while doing something as mundane as rolling over a 401(k) It definitely means having to think about and talk about things that I bet a good number of married heterosexual couples don’t think about. In many cases, they don’t have to. Just being married protects them.

It’s something we faced when we finalized Parker’s adoption, and took the occasion to update our wills, as well as completing advance directives and medical powers of attorney. And it’s something we’ll have to think about again, as we update our wills and other documents when we finalize Dylan’s adoption. It was yesterday, after the social worker (who’d came over for one of the required home study visits before Dylan’s adoption is finalized), and after we had dinner that the hubby told me about the latest development in Maryland.

Read the rest of this entry »

Like some middle class kids in my generation, education was a high priority. In my house it was emphasized as the doorway to upward mobility. (The idea of learning for learning’s sake was something I discovered later.) If I wanted a "good job," I’d better — at least — get an undergraduate degree. It wasn’t a question of if I’d go to college, but where, as far as my parents were concerned.

"Where you’ll go," I recall my dad saying, "I don’t know. But you’re going to somebody’s university." My dad’s desire for me to go to college was probably due in part to his never having been. The son of sharecroppers, he left the far via the draft, and never looked back. Despite his lack of a college degree (he did earn technical school degree, as I recall), my dad managed to find a "good job" and make a "good living" to provide for his family. He believed getting a college education would help me do the same and do better.

My dad did well despite not going to college, and I believe I’ve benefited immensely because of the college education he helped me get. I doubt I’d be doing the kind of work I’m doing without it. But in the current economy, stories like my dad’s and mine may be fewer and far between.

Read the rest of this entry »

Imagine that you’ve come upon two people who have somehow fallen into a very deep hole, which neither of them can climb out of on their own. (Nor, for some reason, can they help one another climb out.) In the course of figuring out what to do, you learn how they each came to be in that hole.

One of them fell in because he either didn’t see the hole or should have seen it but wasn’t paying attention. OK, so he could have avoided falling into the hole if he’d been more careful. The other person, you find out, apparently dug the hole for the one who fell in first, and then fell in himself.

Which one do you help out of the hole? The careless one who fell in first? Or the one who dug the hole in the first place? Which one do you leave in the hole? Which one do you help out first?

Conservatism says you definitely help the guy who dug the hole in the first place climb out of it. Not only that but you give him a brand new shovel and send him on his way. Maybe you leave the other guy in the hole, and maybe you don’t. In the latter case, there are serious moral questions to consider.

Read the rest of this entry »

Nothing like a blog meme to get you back into gear when you’re recovering from a huge conference, like the one I worked at earlier this week. So I have Dana to thank for getting me back to blogging, by tagging me for this rather interesting meme.

Read the rest of this entry »

Well. I thought all this time that the Bush administration was so resoundingly disliked because of their long list of blunders in domestic policy, foreign policy, and pretty much everything else. Come to find out, that’s what they intended all along.

Read the rest of this entry »

I sat on the panel on “Blog Power: 2008 and Beyond” at the Take Back America conference yesterday, alongside Pam Spaulding, Digby, Tracy Russo, and Chris Bowers. Towards the end, someone in the audience asked a question that made me think about being a progressive means to me, and why I’m a progressive. The question, and I’m paraphrasing here, was “What will the progressive blogosphere do after the election,” when a Democratic president is sworn in and Democratic majorities secured in Congress?

Read the rest of this entry »

I’ve said it time and time again. I’ve gone on about it at length. All I can say now is, “I told you the man ain’t right.”

Ed. Note: I’m attending the Take Back America Conference this week — as part of my day job duties — and since I’m blogging the conference there, I thought I’d blog it here too. Since I’ve been blogging about health care lately, I thought I’d cover the health care panel session.

Starting with Monday’s panel, “Health Care For All: The Plan to Get There,” during Take Back America we’re talking about health care. Every day. It’s obvious why. Health care is a concern for every family in America — those with insurance and the 47 million Americans without it.

• It’s a top concern for young voters, who don’t have health insurance and aren’t sure they will be able to afford insurance in the future.
• It’s a concern for working Americans who must give up an ever-growing chunk of their paychecks to gain health insurance through their employers.
• It’ a concern for people with insurance, who face enormous bills for out-of-network medical services.
• It’s a concern for anyone who’s ill and discovers their insurer is more effective at setting up barriers to treatment than helping them get needed care.
• It’s a concern for the insured who are coping with chronic illness — their own or a family member’s — and are hitting the lifetime cost limit on their coverage.
• It’s a concern for anyone who’s had their coverage revoked in the middle of a major illness, by an insurer that rewards employees with bonuses for canceling policies.
• It’s a concern for anyone who decides against DNA testing that might reveal a genetic predisposition to disease (and lead to an early opportunity for early intervention), because the results may cause them to be denied health insurance.
• It’s a concern for every child without health insurance, and every school that spends more time finding medical care for students than educating them.
• It’s a concern for anyone bankrupted by a major illness, who — before the subprime mortgage crisis — accounted for almost half of bankruptcy filings.

Those are the stories behind some of the numbers presented by Prof. Jacob Hacker, author of “Health Care for America,” which has been adopted in one form or another by the remaining Democratic presidential candidates. Prof. Hacker shared that:

• three in ten of the non-elderly are underinsured
• four in ten put off home and car maintenance to pay for needed care
• six in ten postpone needed care due to difficulty paying
• one third dip into savings to pay for needed care
• more than 1 in five made job decisions based on health care

Dr. Maya Rockeymoore addressed healthcare as a civil rights issue, and noted the disparities of the current system, particularly where African Americans are concerned. Even the U.N. has noted and expressed concern about “wide racial disparities” in women’s health care in the U.S. (No surprise, since the U.S. comes in last — beaten out by first-place France — in providing effective and timely health care to citizens.)

Finally, Ezra Klein emphasized the importance of winning elections, and the imperative of winning enough seats in the Senate, if we’re going to achieve health care for all. Ezra also offered what was perhaps the most succinct and memorable advice for progressives moving forward on health care: Make health care for Republicans what they tried to made Iraq for Democrats.

Check out the video of the this panel for more details.