http://www.republicoft.com/2008/12/11/jon-stewart-gets-it-too/ Black. Gay. Father. Vegetarian. Buddhist. Liberal. Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:47:01 -0500 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.republicoft.com/2008/12/11/jon-stewart-gets-it-too/comment-page-1/#comment-187050 David Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:25:28 +0000 http://www.republicoft.com/2008/12/11/jon-stewart-gets-it-too/#comment-187050 I saw this interview too, and some of the most important points Stewart made were about the fact that marriage for five thousand years has been redefined over and over again, from a sort of property arrangement, through polygamy to the one man, one woman modern concept. So if we are going back to Biblical marriage, why not have many wives, and stone them when they commit adultery? I saw this interview too, and some of the most important points Stewart made were about the fact that marriage for five thousand years has been redefined over and over again, from a sort of property arrangement, through polygamy to the one man, one woman modern concept. So if we are going back to Biblical marriage, why not have many wives, and stone them when they commit adultery?

]]> http://www.republicoft.com/2008/12/11/jon-stewart-gets-it-too/comment-page-1/#comment-187034 Katharine Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:44:19 +0000 http://www.republicoft.com/2008/12/11/jon-stewart-gets-it-too/#comment-187034 Something to note, and that I would have gone after but Stewart didn't, was Huckabee's repeatedly tying marriage to conception (something you've brought up numerous times). I'd like to hear him defend how a childless couple (be it by choice or by medical/physical inability) is any less married than a couple with children. Something to note, and that I would have gone after but Stewart didn’t, was Huckabee’s repeatedly tying marriage to conception (something you’ve brought up numerous times). I’d like to hear him defend how a childless couple (be it by choice or by medical/physical inability) is any less married than a couple with children.

]]>