<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digest for March 25th through March 27th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.republicoft.com/2009/03/28/digest-for-march-25th-through-march-27th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.republicoft.com/2009/03/28/digest-for-march-25th-through-march-27th/</link>
	<description>Black. Gay. Father. Vegetarian. Buddhist. Liberal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:47:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: terrance</title>
		<link>http://www.republicoft.com/2009/03/28/digest-for-march-25th-through-march-27th/comment-page-1/#comment-189822</link>
		<dc:creator>terrance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/?p=3335#comment-189822</guid>
		<description>Not sure why that link didn&#039;t work. Here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/workplace/133627/aig_exec_whines_about_public_anger%2C_and_now_we%27re_supposed_to_pity_him_yeah%2C_right/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the correct link&lt;/a&gt;. And I personally don&#039;t have a dispute with the factual presentation part. 

Neither does this guy (a non-practicing attorney), but he still goes on to say &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mitchell-bard/why-i-have-no-sympathy-fo_b_179520.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;why he has no sympathy for Jake DeSantis&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
The lawyer in me (I should really say &quot;recovering lawyer,&quot; since I haven&#039;t practiced in 15 years) understands his point. He contracted to work with his salary essentially being his bonus, and after fulfilling his obligations (he argues that it was a form of public service, but let&#039;s just stick to the idea that he served the company), the CEO is asking him to forgo his pay. It&#039;s an argument, in strictly letter-of-the-law terms, I could comfortably make to a judge or jury.

But as a person, I am not the least bit moved by DeSantis&#039;s point of view, because over the last several years, he has tremendously profited from a larger financial culture that is completely out of whack. Those working in the financial industry made untold sums of money from a bubble that was bound to burst, and they did so in an environment that rewarded risk with no consequences for failure.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why that link didn&#8217;t work. Here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.alternet.org/workplace/133627/aig_exec_whines_about_public_anger%2C_and_now_we%27re_supposed_to_pity_him_yeah%2C_right/" rel="nofollow">the correct link</a>. And I personally don&#8217;t have a dispute with the factual presentation part. </p>
<p>Neither does this guy (a non-practicing attorney), but he still goes on to say <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mitchell-bard/why-i-have-no-sympathy-fo_b_179520.html" rel="nofollow">why he has no sympathy for Jake DeSantis</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>
The lawyer in me (I should really say &#8220;recovering lawyer,&#8221; since I haven&#8217;t practiced in 15 years) understands his point. He contracted to work with his salary essentially being his bonus, and after fulfilling his obligations (he argues that it was a form of public service, but let&#8217;s just stick to the idea that he served the company), the CEO is asking him to forgo his pay. It&#8217;s an argument, in strictly letter-of-the-law terms, I could comfortably make to a judge or jury.</p>
<p>But as a person, I am not the least bit moved by DeSantis&#8217;s point of view, because over the last several years, he has tremendously profited from a larger financial culture that is completely out of whack. Those working in the financial industry made untold sums of money from a bubble that was bound to burst, and they did so in an environment that rewarded risk with no consequences for failure.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KipEsquire</title>
		<link>http://www.republicoft.com/2009/03/28/digest-for-march-25th-through-march-27th/comment-page-1/#comment-189802</link>
		<dc:creator>KipEsquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/?p=3335#comment-189802</guid>
		<description>&quot;AIG Exec Whines&quot; link is bad.

And besides, he wasn&#039;t &quot;whining&quot; -- he was trying to provide facts. Or don&#039;t radical liberals care about facts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;AIG Exec Whines&#8221; link is bad.</p>
<p>And besides, he wasn&#8217;t &#8220;whining&#8221; &#8212; he was trying to provide facts. Or don&#8217;t radical liberals care about facts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

