<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Morality of Health Care Reform, Pt. 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.republicoft.com/2009/09/18/the-morality-of-health-care-reform-pt-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.republicoft.com/2009/09/18/the-morality-of-health-care-reform-pt-3/</link>
	<description>Black. Gay. Father. Vegetarian. Buddhist. Liberal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:47:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wellescent Health</title>
		<link>http://www.republicoft.com/2009/09/18/the-morality-of-health-care-reform-pt-3/comment-page-1/#comment-206136</link>
		<dc:creator>Wellescent Health</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/2009/09/18/the-morality-of-health-care-reform-pt-3/#comment-206136</guid>
		<description>Excellent article.

Even if a person argues that the costs are expensive to treat everyone, this too is based on assumptions that are incorrect. With the US spending some 16-17% of GDP on health care, as compared to other countries like those mentioned in the article spending roughly 10%, there is the ability to cover the entire population and still spend less over all by eliminating the inefficiencies of the current broken system. Its rare when two problems can be fixed with one effort so its time to stop missing out on the opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article.</p>
<p>Even if a person argues that the costs are expensive to treat everyone, this too is based on assumptions that are incorrect. With the US spending some 16-17% of GDP on health care, as compared to other countries like those mentioned in the article spending roughly 10%, there is the ability to cover the entire population and still spend less over all by eliminating the inefficiencies of the current broken system. Its rare when two problems can be fixed with one effort so its time to stop missing out on the opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

